All subjects · Economics · WEC11 Markets in action

Public goods and the free-rider problem

Edexcel IAL Economics · WEC11 Markets in action

Some goods would hardly be provided at all by a free market. This lesson covers spec point 1.3.5.3: the distinction between private goods and public goods, and why the free-rider problem leads to under-provision.

Practise this in the app: instant marking and a fix for every mistake. Free, no email needed to start.

Practise this lesson

Private and public goods

A private good is:

A public good is:

Many goods are in between: a toll road is excludable but non-rival until it becomes congested; a fishing area is rival but hard to exclude people from. These are sometimes called quasi-public goods.

The free-rider problem

Because a public good is non-excludable, people can benefit without paying: they free ride on others who pay. Knowing this, each person has an incentive not to reveal how much they value the good. Firms therefore cannot charge enough to make a profit, so the private sector provides too little or none of the good: a missing market (complete market failure), even though society would value it more than it costs.

This is why public goods are usually provided by the state and financed by taxation, which everyone must pay.

Evaluation points

Worked example

Explain why street lighting is unlikely to be provided by a free market.

  1. Street lighting is non-rival: one person using the light does not reduce the light for others.
  2. It is non-excludable: non-payers cannot be stopped from benefiting.
  3. So people free ride, and a private firm cannot collect enough revenue to make a profit.
  4. The market under-provides or does not provide it: a missing market.

Answer: Non-excludability creates a free-rider problem, so private firms cannot profit and the market fails to provide it.

Key idea: Private goods: rival and excludable. Public goods: non-rival and non-excludable. Non-excludability causes free riding, so profit-seeking firms under-provide or do not provide them.

Check yourself

  1. A good is non-excludable when
    • one person's use reduces the amount available to others
    • it has no substitutes
    • people who do not pay cannot be prevented from consuming it
    • it is provided by the government
    Show answer

    people who do not pay cannot be prevented from consuming it. Non-excludability is what allows free riding.

  2. Which property means that one more person enjoying a fireworks display does not reduce others' enjoyment?
    • Non-rivalry
    • Non-excludability
    • Excludability
    • Price inelasticity
    Show answer

    Non-rivalry. Extra consumers do not reduce the amount available to others.

  3. Which is the best example of a public good?
    • A cinema ticket
    • A bus journey
    • A flood defence barrier protecting a town
    • A private swimming pool
    Show answer

    A flood defence barrier protecting a town. Everyone behind the barrier is protected, whether they pay or not, and protecting one more home does not reduce protection for others.

  4. The free-rider problem means that
    • goods are always provided free by the government
    • people can benefit from a good without paying, so firms cannot make a profit supplying it
    • consumers always reveal their true willingness to pay
    • rival goods become excludable
    Show answer

    people can benefit from a good without paying, so firms cannot make a profit supplying it. Non-payers cannot be excluded, so revenue is too low for private provision.

  5. A chocolate bar is a private good because it is
    • non-rivalrous and non-excludable
    • non-rivalrous but excludable
    • rivalrous but non-excludable
    • rivalrous and excludable
    Show answer

    rivalrous and excludable. If you eat it, no one else can; and the shop can refuse to sell to non-payers.

  6. Explain why the free-rider problem leads to market failure.
    Show answer

    Because a public good is non-excludable, people can enjoy it without paying, so they have no incentive to pay. Private firms cannot earn enough revenue to cover costs, so the good is under-provided or not provided at all, even though society values it.. Non-excludability, then the firm's revenue problem, then the outcome.

Practise with instant feedback

Sources

Last updated 8 November 2026. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.