All subjects · Economics · WEC13 Business behaviour

Contestable markets

Edexcel IAL Economics · WEC13 Business behaviour

A market's behaviour depends not only on how many firms are in it, but on how easily new firms could enter. That is the idea of contestability.

Practise this in the app: instant marking and a fix for every mistake. Free, no email needed to start.

Practise this lesson

Characteristics

A perfectly contestable market has:

This allows hit-and-run entry: a firm can enter when supernormal profit exists, take the profit, and leave.

Implications for prices and profits

Even a monopoly or oligopoly in a contestable market cannot safely earn large supernormal profits, because they would attract hit-and-run entry. So incumbents keep prices close to average cost and earn close to normal profit in the long run, and they have a strong incentive to keep costs low. They may use limit pricing: setting price at a level an entrant could not profitably undercut.

Sunk costs and degrees of contestability

Sunk costs are the key: the higher the unrecoverable costs of entry (advertising, specialist equipment, research), the less contestable the market. Markets are more or less contestable rather than perfect. Example: a single airline route can be fairly contestable if aircraft can be moved to other routes (low sunk cost), but airport slot shortages reduce contestability.

Costs and benefits

Benefits: lower prices, productive and X-efficiency, normal profit; a structure test (number of firms) can be misleading, so regulators look at contestability.

Costs/limits: perfect contestability rarely exists; limit pricing still keeps price above the competitive level; in practice incumbents can react quickly with price cuts, which deters entry; low profits may reduce dynamic efficiency.

Worked example

A firm can enter a market by buying equipment for $10m, which it could resell for $7m if it left. Find the sunk cost and explain its significance.

  1. Sunk cost = 10 - 7 = $3m: the part that cannot be recovered.
  2. The larger this is relative to expected profit, the riskier entry is.
  3. So the market is less contestable, and incumbents can keep higher profits.

Answer: Sunk cost $3m; it reduces contestability.

Key idea: Contestable market: free entry and exit, no sunk costs, so hit-and-run entry is possible. Incumbents keep prices near average cost and earn near-normal profit, whatever the number of firms.

Check yourself

  1. Entry requires $25m of spending, of which equipment worth $16m can be resold on exit. Find the sunk cost in $m.
    Show answer

    $9 m. 25 - 16 = $9m cannot be recovered.

  2. For the same entrant ($25m spending, $16m recoverable), what percentage of entry spending is sunk?
    Show answer

    36 %. 9 / 25 x 100 = 36%.

  3. Which feature is most important for a market to be contestable?
    • Low sunk costs
    • A large number of firms
    • Identical products
    • High advertising spending
    Show answer

    Low sunk costs. Low sunk costs make hit-and-run entry possible.

  4. Hit-and-run entry means
    • a firm drives rivals out with low prices
    • two firms merge and then demerge
    • a firm enters a market with a patent
    • a firm enters to take supernormal profit and leaves when it disappears
    Show answer

    a firm enters to take supernormal profit and leaves when it disappears. Possible only when exit is cheap.

  5. In a highly contestable market with one incumbent firm, the incumbent is likely to
    • charge the full monopoly price
    • keep prices close to average cost
    • earn large supernormal profits indefinitely
    • ignore potential entrants
    Show answer

    keep prices close to average cost. High prices would attract entrants.

  6. Why might an incumbent use limit pricing in a contestable market?
    • To maximise short-run profit
    • To drive out an existing rival by pricing below AVC
    • To raise barriers to exit
    • To make entry unprofitable while still earning some profit
    Show answer

    To make entry unprofitable while still earning some profit. Price is just below the level that would attract entry.

  7. What does contestability theory suggest about judging competition by the number of firms?
    • It is always accurate
    • It can be misleading, since the threat of entry also disciplines firms
    • Only monopolies need regulation
    • Concentration ratios measure contestability exactly
    Show answer

    It can be misleading, since the threat of entry also disciplines firms. Behaviour depends on potential competition too.

Practise with instant feedback

Sources

Last updated 8 November 2026. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.