All subjects · Economics · WEC13 Business behaviour
Contestable markets
Edexcel IAL Economics · WEC13 Business behaviour
A market's behaviour depends not only on how many firms are in it, but on how easily new firms could enter. That is the idea of contestability.
Characteristics
A perfectly contestable market has:
- No barriers to entry or exit.
- No sunk costs: an entrant can leave and recover its spending.
- Access to the same technology as incumbents (no cost disadvantage).
- Perfect information.
This allows hit-and-run entry: a firm can enter when supernormal profit exists, take the profit, and leave.
Implications for prices and profits
Even a monopoly or oligopoly in a contestable market cannot safely earn large supernormal profits, because they would attract hit-and-run entry. So incumbents keep prices close to average cost and earn close to normal profit in the long run, and they have a strong incentive to keep costs low. They may use limit pricing: setting price at a level an entrant could not profitably undercut.
Sunk costs and degrees of contestability
Sunk costs are the key: the higher the unrecoverable costs of entry (advertising, specialist equipment, research), the less contestable the market. Markets are more or less contestable rather than perfect. Example: a single airline route can be fairly contestable if aircraft can be moved to other routes (low sunk cost), but airport slot shortages reduce contestability.
Costs and benefits
Benefits: lower prices, productive and X-efficiency, normal profit; a structure test (number of firms) can be misleading, so regulators look at contestability.
Costs/limits: perfect contestability rarely exists; limit pricing still keeps price above the competitive level; in practice incumbents can react quickly with price cuts, which deters entry; low profits may reduce dynamic efficiency.
Worked example
A firm can enter a market by buying equipment for $10m, which it could resell for $7m if it left. Find the sunk cost and explain its significance.
- Sunk cost = 10 - 7 = $3m: the part that cannot be recovered.
- The larger this is relative to expected profit, the riskier entry is.
- So the market is less contestable, and incumbents can keep higher profits.
Answer: Sunk cost $3m; it reduces contestability.
Check yourself
- Entry requires $25m of spending, of which equipment worth $16m can be resold on exit. Find the sunk cost in $m.
Show answer
$9 m. 25 - 16 = $9m cannot be recovered.
- For the same entrant ($25m spending, $16m recoverable), what percentage of entry spending is sunk?
Show answer
36 %. 9 / 25 x 100 = 36%.
- Which feature is most important for a market to be contestable?
- Low sunk costs
- A large number of firms
- Identical products
- High advertising spending
Show answer
Low sunk costs. Low sunk costs make hit-and-run entry possible.
- Hit-and-run entry means
- a firm drives rivals out with low prices
- two firms merge and then demerge
- a firm enters a market with a patent
- a firm enters to take supernormal profit and leaves when it disappears
Show answer
a firm enters to take supernormal profit and leaves when it disappears. Possible only when exit is cheap.
- In a highly contestable market with one incumbent firm, the incumbent is likely to
- charge the full monopoly price
- keep prices close to average cost
- earn large supernormal profits indefinitely
- ignore potential entrants
Show answer
keep prices close to average cost. High prices would attract entrants.
- Why might an incumbent use limit pricing in a contestable market?
- To maximise short-run profit
- To drive out an existing rival by pricing below AVC
- To raise barriers to exit
- To make entry unprofitable while still earning some profit
Show answer
To make entry unprofitable while still earning some profit. Price is just below the level that would attract entry.
- What does contestability theory suggest about judging competition by the number of firms?
- It is always accurate
- It can be misleading, since the threat of entry also disciplines firms
- Only monopolies need regulation
- Concentration ratios measure contestability exactly
Show answer
It can be misleading, since the threat of entry also disciplines firms. Behaviour depends on potential competition too.
Sources
Last updated 8 November 2026. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.