All subjects · Psychology · WPS01 Social and Cognitive Psychology

Optional contemporary study: Huang et al. (2014)

Edexcel IAL Psychology · WPS01 Social and Cognitive Psychology

Yi Huang, Keith Kendrick and Rongjun Yu (2014), 'Conformity to the opinions of other people lasts for no more than 3 days' (Psychological Science), is one of the two optional contemporary studies (1.3.3). Learn this one or Haun et al. (2014).

Practise this in the app: instant marking and a fix for every mistake. Free, no email needed to start.

Practise this lesson

Aim

To find out whether conformity is just a short-lived public change (compliance) or a change in privately held views, by testing how long the effect of a group norm lasts.

Procedure

Results, conclusions and evaluation

Conclusion: group opinion does change private judgements, so the effect is more than momentary compliance, but the change is short-lived, lasting no more than about 3 days. The reason for the 3-day limit was not known; the authors planned to study possible brain mechanisms.

Evaluation: a large, standardised set of stimuli and a delayed private re-rating test private change rather than public compliance; controls for regression to the mean. But judging faces is a trivial task (low ecological validity), so beliefs that matter more (politics, values) may behave differently; one culture (Chinese students) limits generalisability; participants could hardly remember 280 group ratings, so the mechanism is unclear.

Worked example

A participant rated a face 6. The group rating shown was 3 points lower. What group rating was shown, and what would conformity look like when she re-rates the face 1 day later?

  1. Group rating = 6 - 3 = 3.
  2. Conformity: her re-rating moves towards 3, for example to 5.
  3. At 7 days the study found no such shift on average.

Answer: The group rating was 3; conformity would mean re-rating below 6, towards 3 (found at 1 and 3 days, not at 7 days).

Key idea: Huang et al. (2014): Chinese students rated 280 faces (1 to 8), saw a fake average of 200 peers (same only 25% of the time), re-rated after 1, 3, 7 days or 3 months. Conformity at 1 and 3 days only.

Check yourself

  1. The group rating differed from the participant's own on 75% of the 280 faces. On how many faces did it differ?
    Show answer

    210 faces. 0.75 x 280 = 210 faces.

  2. How long did the conformity effect last?
    • No more than about 3 days
    • At least 3 months
    • Only during the first session
    • Exactly 7 days
    Show answer

    No more than about 3 days. Effects appeared at 1 and 3 days but not at 7 days or 3 months.

  3. What was the dependent variable?
    • The number of faces shown
    • The delay before re-rating
    • The participants' attractiveness ratings of the faces
    • The average rating of 200 students
    Show answer

    The participants' attractiveness ratings of the faces. Ratings were measured; the group norm and delay were manipulated.

  4. What rating scale was used?
    • A yes/no judgement
    • An 8-point attractiveness scale (1 to 8)
    • A 100-point slider
    • Ranking the faces from best to worst
    Show answer

    An 8-point attractiveness scale (1 to 8). Faces were rated 1 to 8.

  5. Why does the re-rating days later suggest private change rather than just compliance?
    • The group was present when they re-rated
    • Participants were paid to change their ratings
    • The faces were different at re-rating
    • Participants rated privately without the group norm in front of them, yet their ratings had shifted
    Show answer

    Participants rated privately without the group norm in front of them, yet their ratings had shifted. Without public pressure, a shift suggests their own judgement changed.

  6. Give one weakness of Huang et al. (2014).
    Show answer

    Rating faces is a trivial, artificial task, so the findings may not generalise to important beliefs such as political opinions.. Task and sample limit how far the findings apply.

Practise with instant feedback

Sources

Last updated 8 November 2026. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.