All subjects · Psychology · WPS03 Applications of Psychology
Criminological psychology (option): CBT for offenders and its effectiveness
Edexcel IAL Psychology · WPS03 Applications of Psychology
The treatment in this topic is cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for offenders: how it is used and how effective it is (spec 6.1.6).
How CBT works with offenders
CBT assumes thoughts, feelings and behaviour are linked: faulty or distorted thinking leads to problem behaviour, so changing thinking changes behaviour.
Offenders may show cognitive distortions such as:
- Minimisation ('nobody really got hurt').
- Hostile attribution bias (seeing neutral actions as threats: 'he looked at me, so he wanted a fight').
- Blaming others or the victim.
Typical stages:
1. Assessment and identifying distorted thoughts (often from a formulation).
2. Challenging the thoughts: examining evidence, considering other explanations, taking the victim's perspective.
3. Skills training: problem-solving, anger control, social skills, moral reasoning, often through role-play.
4. Practice and homework, relapse prevention.
CBT for offenders is often delivered in groups in prison or the community, in structured programmes.
Effectiveness
Lipsey, Landenberger and Wilson (2007), a systematic review of 58 studies:
- On average CBT reduced reoffending by about 25% (from about 40% in control groups to about 30%).
- The best-designed programmes were predicted to cut reoffending by about 52%.
- Larger effects with higher-risk offenders, high-quality implementation by well-trained staff, and programmes including anger control and interpersonal problem-solving.
- No 'brand name' programme was better than the others, and prison versus community setting made no difference.
Evaluation
- Strengths: strong evidence base from many controlled studies; structured, so it can be delivered consistently to groups (cost-effective); targets thinking linked to offending; works across settings.
- Weaknesses: effectiveness depends on staff training and offender motivation, and drop-out is common; offenders may say what staff want to hear (social desirability), so changes in thinking may not last outside; it focuses on the individual and may ignore social causes such as poverty, peers or housing; measuring reoffending relies on reconvictions, which miss undetected crime.
Worked example
Using Lipsey et al.'s figures, reoffending fell from about 40% to about 30%. Show that this is a 25% reduction.
- Fall = 40 - 30 = 10 percentage points.
- 10 / 40 x 100 = 25.0% of the original rate.
- So reoffending fell by a quarter.
Answer: 10 / 40 = 25%.
Check yourself
- An offender says 'He looked at me funny, so he was asking for it.' This shows
- hostile attribution bias
- minimisation
- a protective factor
- weapons focus
Show answer
hostile attribution bias. Neutral actions seen as hostile.
- 'It was only a bit of shoplifting, it doesn't hurt anyone' is an example of
- hostile attribution bias
- post-event information
- minimisation
- a self-fulfilling prophecy
Show answer
minimisation. Playing down the harm.
- How many studies did Lipsey, Landenberger and Wilson (2007) review?
Show answer
58. 58 studies.
- Lipsey et al. (2007) found CBT worked better when
- it was a famous brand-name programme
- it was delivered only in prisons
- offenders were low-risk
- it was delivered well by trained staff to higher-risk offenders
Show answer
it was delivered well by trained staff to higher-risk offenders. Implementation quality and risk level mattered.
- Which is a weakness of CBT for offenders?
- It has never been evaluated
- It may ignore social causes such as poverty
- It cannot be delivered in groups
- It relies on medication
Show answer
It may ignore social causes such as poverty. Individual focus.
- Evaluate the effectiveness of CBT as a treatment for offenders in one point.
Show answer
Lipsey et al.'s review of 58 studies found CBT reduced reoffending by about 25%, but effectiveness depends on staff training and offender motivation.. Evidence plus a limitation.
Sources
- Pearson Edexcel International Advanced Subsidiary/Advanced Level in Psychology specification, Issue 6 (November 2024, first assessment January 2026)
- Lipsey, Landenberger and Wilson (2007), Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders, Campbell Systematic Reviews
Last updated 8 November 2026. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.