All subjects · Psychology · WPS03 Applications of Psychology
Interpreting data and evaluating developmental research
Edexcel IAL Psychology · WPS03 Applications of Psychology
Unit 3 can ask you to use List A (descriptive statistics) and List B (inferential statistics) in developmental contexts, and to evaluate studies (spec 5.3.4 and 5.3.5). Here they are applied to attachment and language data.
Choosing the test
| Question | Data | Design | Test |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difference | Nominal (categories, frequencies) | Independent groups | Chi-squared |
| Difference | At least ordinal | Repeated measures | Wilcoxon signed ranks |
| Relationship | At least ordinal (pairs of scores) | Correlation | Spearman's rank |
List B tests
Chi-squared with real attachment data
From van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988): Germany had 48 avoidant and 88 not avoidant infants; Japan had 5 avoidant and 91 not avoidant.
- Expected frequency = row total x column total / grand total. E.g. Germany avoidant: 136 x 53 / 232 = 31.07.
- χ² = Σ (O - E)² / E = 28.90, df = (2 - 1) x (2 - 1) = 1.
- Critical value (df 1, two-tailed, p ≤ .01) = 6.64. 28.90 ≥ 6.64, so the difference in avoidant attachment between Germany and Japan is significant at p ≤ .01: reject the null hypothesis.
| df | One-tailed p ≤ .05 | Two-tailed p ≤ .05 | Two-tailed p ≤ .01 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.64 |
| 2 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
| 3 | 6.25 | 7.82 | 11.35 |
Extract from Pearson's chi-squared critical values table (observed must be equal to or greater than critical)
Spearman's rank with language data
Invented data for practice: hours of shared reading per week and vocabulary scores for 10 children.
Reading: 2, 5, 1, 7, 4, 6, 3, 8, 0, 5
Vocabulary: 38, 52, 30, 61, 47, 50, 41, 66, 28, 55
- Rank each variable (ties share the average rank), find d for each child, square and add: Σd² = 6.5.
- rs = 1 - 6Σd² / (n(n² - 1)) = 1 - 6 x 6.5 / (10 x 99) = 0.961.
- Critical value (N = 10, two-tailed, p ≤ .05) = 0.648; at p ≤ .01 = 0.794. 0.961 ≥ both, so there is a significant positive correlation. It does not show that reading causes vocabulary growth.
| N | One-tailed p ≤ .05 | Two-tailed p ≤ .05 | Two-tailed p ≤ .01 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 0.643 | 0.738 | 0.881 |
| 10 | 0.564 | 0.648 | 0.794 |
| 12 | 0.503 | 0.587 | 0.727 |
Extract from Pearson's Spearman's rank critical values table
Evaluating developmental research
Evaluate in the terms the specification uses: reliability, validity, generalisability, credibility, objectivity and subjectivity, ethics and practical application.
- Type I error: claiming a significant effect that is really chance (more likely at p ≤ .10). Type II error: missing a real effect (more likely at p ≤ .01).
- Descriptive statistics (List A): mean, median, mode, range, standard deviation, frequency tables, bar charts and histograms, percentages and ratios; normal and skewed distributions.
- Always sense-check: in a one-tailed test, results must go in the predicted direction.
Worked example
A study finds χ² = 3.20 (df 1) comparing secure attachment in day-care and home-reared infants, with a two-tailed hypothesis. Is it significant at p ≤ .05?
- Critical value for df 1, two-tailed, p ≤ .05 is 3.84.
- 3.20 is less than 3.84.
- So it is not significant: keep the null hypothesis.
Answer: Not significant at p ≤ .05.
Check yourself
- Using Germany (48 avoidant, 88 not) and Japan (5 avoidant, 91 not), the expected frequency for Japan avoidant is row total x column total / grand total. Calculate it to 2 decimal places.
Show answer
21.93. 96 x 53 / 232 = 21.93.
- What are the degrees of freedom for a 2 x 2 chi-squared table?
Show answer
1. (2 - 1) x (2 - 1) = 1.
- For the invented reading and vocabulary data, Σd² = 6.5 and n = 10. Calculate Spearman's rs to 3 decimal places.
Show answer
0.961. 1 - 6 x 6.5 / (10 x 99) = 0.961.
- A researcher records whether children in two separate nurseries show secure or insecure attachment. Which test should she use?
- Spearman's rank
- Wilcoxon signed ranks
- No test is possible
- Chi-squared
Show answer
Chi-squared. Nominal categories, independent groups, difference.
- Using p ≤ .10 instead of p ≤ .05 increases the risk of
- a Type II error
- a Type I error
- attrition
- a cohort effect
Show answer
a Type I error. A lenient level makes false positives more likely.
- Most children in a sample score low on a vocabulary test, with a few very high scores. The distribution is
- negatively skewed
- normal
- bimodal and symmetrical
- positively skewed
Show answer
positively skewed. The tail points to the high scores.
- Explain why Spearman's rank is the appropriate test for the reading and vocabulary data.
Show answer
The study looks for a relationship (correlation) between two co-variables, each child gives a pair of scores, and the data are at least ordinal.. Hypothesis type plus data.
Sources
- Pearson Edexcel International Advanced Subsidiary/Advanced Level in Psychology specification, Issue 6 (November 2024, first assessment January 2026)
- Pearson IAL Psychology summary of studies: WPS03
- Pearson WPS03/01 question paper, January 2022 (formulae and critical values tables)
- Pearson WPS03/01 examiners' report, January 2025
Last updated 8 November 2026. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.