All subjects · Psychology · WPS03 Applications of Psychology

Interpreting data and evaluating developmental research

Edexcel IAL Psychology · WPS03 Applications of Psychology

Unit 3 can ask you to use List A (descriptive statistics) and List B (inferential statistics) in developmental contexts, and to evaluate studies (spec 5.3.4 and 5.3.5). Here they are applied to attachment and language data.

Practise this in the app: instant marking and a fix for every mistake. Free, no email needed to start.

Practise this lesson

Choosing the test

QuestionDataDesignTest
DifferenceNominal (categories, frequencies)Independent groupsChi-squared
DifferenceAt least ordinalRepeated measuresWilcoxon signed ranks
RelationshipAt least ordinal (pairs of scores)CorrelationSpearman's rank

List B tests

Chi-squared with real attachment data

From van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988): Germany had 48 avoidant and 88 not avoidant infants; Japan had 5 avoidant and 91 not avoidant.

dfOne-tailed p ≤ .05Two-tailed p ≤ .05Two-tailed p ≤ .01
12.713.846.64
24.615.999.21
36.257.8211.35

Extract from Pearson's chi-squared critical values table (observed must be equal to or greater than critical)

Spearman's rank with language data

Invented data for practice: hours of shared reading per week and vocabulary scores for 10 children.

Reading: 2, 5, 1, 7, 4, 6, 3, 8, 0, 5

Vocabulary: 38, 52, 30, 61, 47, 50, 41, 66, 28, 55

NOne-tailed p ≤ .05Two-tailed p ≤ .05Two-tailed p ≤ .01
80.6430.7380.881
100.5640.6480.794
120.5030.5870.727

Extract from Pearson's Spearman's rank critical values table

Evaluating developmental research

Evaluate in the terms the specification uses: reliability, validity, generalisability, credibility, objectivity and subjectivity, ethics and practical application.

Worked example

A study finds χ² = 3.20 (df 1) comparing secure attachment in day-care and home-reared infants, with a two-tailed hypothesis. Is it significant at p ≤ .05?

  1. Critical value for df 1, two-tailed, p ≤ .05 is 3.84.
  2. 3.20 is less than 3.84.
  3. So it is not significant: keep the null hypothesis.

Answer: Not significant at p ≤ .05.

Key idea: Chi-squared for nominal, independent groups differences; Wilcoxon for repeated measures; Spearman for correlation. Germany v Japan avoidant attachment gives a significant chi-squared. Observed ≥ critical for chi-squared and Spearman; Wilcoxon T ≤ critical. Evaluate with reliability, validity, generalisability, credibility, objectivity, ethics, application.

Check yourself

  1. Using Germany (48 avoidant, 88 not) and Japan (5 avoidant, 91 not), the expected frequency for Japan avoidant is row total x column total / grand total. Calculate it to 2 decimal places.
    Show answer

    21.93. 96 x 53 / 232 = 21.93.

  2. What are the degrees of freedom for a 2 x 2 chi-squared table?
    Show answer

    1. (2 - 1) x (2 - 1) = 1.

  3. For the invented reading and vocabulary data, Σd² = 6.5 and n = 10. Calculate Spearman's rs to 3 decimal places.
    Show answer

    0.961. 1 - 6 x 6.5 / (10 x 99) = 0.961.

  4. A researcher records whether children in two separate nurseries show secure or insecure attachment. Which test should she use?
    • Spearman's rank
    • Wilcoxon signed ranks
    • No test is possible
    • Chi-squared
    Show answer

    Chi-squared. Nominal categories, independent groups, difference.

  5. Using p ≤ .10 instead of p ≤ .05 increases the risk of
    • a Type II error
    • a Type I error
    • attrition
    • a cohort effect
    Show answer

    a Type I error. A lenient level makes false positives more likely.

  6. Most children in a sample score low on a vocabulary test, with a few very high scores. The distribution is
    • negatively skewed
    • normal
    • bimodal and symmetrical
    • positively skewed
    Show answer

    positively skewed. The tail points to the high scores.

  7. Explain why Spearman's rank is the appropriate test for the reading and vocabulary data.
    Show answer

    The study looks for a relationship (correlation) between two co-variables, each child gives a pair of scores, and the data are at least ordinal.. Hypothesis type plus data.

Practise with instant feedback

Sources

Last updated 8 November 2026. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.